NOAA / NWS Discussion

This section is for discussing the situation regarding the government’s handling of funding and staffing for NOAA & NWS.

The usual rules apply: While politics are inevitable here, please state opinions about what is going on without name-calling. And be civil to others commenting.

Comments not following this will be removed.

4 thoughts on “NOAA / NWS Discussion”

  1. Eric fisher

    “All expertise related to radiological and nuclear threats is eliminated. All capacity for natural disasters response has been eliminated,” agency officials said in a memo after the layoffs.

    Health experts tasked with investigating cancer clusters, overseeing chemical weapons demolition and responding to toxic substance spills were also cut, multiple officials said.

    cbsnews.com/news/milwaukee…

    https://x.com/ericfisher/status/1910793569868407141?s=46&t=neG9xl79s_BtNQXSGBlqLQ

  2. And then there is this. Anyone referring to climate change and using the word climate will be fired.

    As a result, the administration now plans to eliminate the research arm of NOAA and close all weather and climate labs and eviscerate its budget along with several other NOAA offices.

    This is because the word climate is used by the agency. I’m trying to figure out how to discuss weather without using the word climate

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your no-hype southeastern New England weather blog!